Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191344›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2021

Optimizing outcomes of ACL surgery-Is autograft reconstruction the only reasonable option?

Martha M Murray

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha M MurrayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5086-9511
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Biologically Enhanced Healing of Autograft ACL Reconstruction.R01AR056834 · NIAMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FLEMING, BRADEN C, MURRAY, MARTHA M · 2009 to 2017
$5.8M
Non-invasive Assessment of Ligament Healing, in VivoR01AR065462 · NIAMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FLEMING, BRADEN C, MURRAY, MARTHA M · 2014 to 2016
$2.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056834NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur at a high frequency in the United States with approximately 400,000 ACL reconstructions being performed each year. While ACL reconstruction is our current gold standard of treatment, it does not restore joint motion, or prevent the premature development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in many patients. Thus, new treatments for an ACL injury, which are less invasive and minimize patient morbidity, including cartilage damage, are highly desirable. We have used a tissue-engineered approach to stimulate ligament healing, to improve upon current treatment options. In this review, we describe and discuss our work moving a tissue engineering strategy from the concept to bench, preclinical, clinical trials and ultimately FDA 510(k) de Novo approval, providing clinicians and patients with a viable alternative to ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate LigamentAutograftsHumansKnee JointTransplantation, AutologousACL reconstructionACL repairanterior cruciate ligamentbridge-enhanced ACL repairclinical trialplateletposttraumatic osteoarthritisscaffold-enhanced ACL repairtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34191344
PMCPMC8387392
OpenAlexW3176945712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.