Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191239›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2021

Updates in Management of Bone Metastatic Disease in Primary Solid Tumors with Systemic Therapies.

Virginia Falvello, Catherine Van Poznak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A modified bone cement pusher for percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with multi-target negative pressure rotary-cutting technique in puncture biopsy for bone tumors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Virginia FalvelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Catherine Van PoznakDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. cvanpoz@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-6908
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to highlight novel and impactful discoveries in systemic treatment of bone metastatic disease in solid tumors published within the past 5 years. RECENT

findingsMajor developments in systemic treatment of bone metastatic disease in solid tumors include evidence that decreasing frequency of dosing zoledronic acid in metastatic breast and prostate cancer maintains efficacy in preventing skeletal-related events while decreasing costs. The landmark findings on the use of Radium-223 to treat metastatic prostate cancer were reported in 2013. Recently, it has been found that not all systemic therapy combinations with Radium-223 are necessarily safe or effective unless bone-targeted therapy is also included in the regimen. More cost-effective dosing intervals of zoledronic acid and efficacy and safety nuances of combination radiopharmaceutical and chemotherapy treatment have been better delineated.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiumZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiumRadium-223Zoledronic AcidBone metastasisRadium-223Skeletal-related eventSolid tumorZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID34191239
OpenAlexW3176227340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.