ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021
Identification of magnetic resonance imaging features for the prediction of molecular profiles of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten Years of VASARI Glioma Features: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Their Impact and Performance.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Pooled it
- Visual versus region-of-interest based diffusion evaluation and their diagnostic impact in adult-type diffuse gliomas.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges in application of VASARI features in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Predicting glioma histo-molecular diagnosis and prognosis: preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging insights.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- OMT and tensor SVD-based deep learning model for segmentation and predicting genetic markers of glioma: A multicenter study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A Radiologist's Guide to IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma for Efficient Communication With Clinicians: Part I-Essential Information on Preoperative and Immediate Postoperative Imaging.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Imaging for Predicting High-risk Molecular Markers of Gliomas.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Application of novel PACS-based informatics platform to identify imaging based predictors of CDKN2A allelic status in glioblastomas.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Correlating MRI features with additional genetic markers and patient survival in histological grade 2-3 IDH-mutant astrocytomas.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 2.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Correlation betweenHeliyon · 2023Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes May Predict CDKN2A/B Homozygous Deletion Status in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Astrocytomas: A Multicenter Study.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Radiomics-based prediction of multiple gene alteration incorporating mutual genetic information in glioblastoma and grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe predicted molecular profiles in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features and explored the associations between imaging features and major molecular alterations.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and available next-generation sequencing results. From preoperative MR imaging, Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images (VASARI) features, volumetric parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained. First, univariate random forest was performed to identify gene abnormalities that could be predicted by imaging features with high accuracy and stability. Next, multivariate random forest was trained to predict the selected genes in the discovery cohort and was validated in the external cohort. Univariable logistic regression was performed to further explore the associations between imaging features and genes.
resultsUnivariate random forest identified nine genes predicted by imaging features, with high accuracy and stability. The multivariate random forest model showed excellent performance in predicting IDH and PTPN11 mutations in the discovery cohort, which were validated in the external validation cohorts (areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUCs] of 0.855 for IDH and 0.88 for PTPN11). ATRX loss and EGFR mutation were predicted with AUCs of 0.753 and 0.739, respectively, whereas PTEN could not be reliably predicted. Based on univariable logistic regression analyses, IDH, ATRX, and TP53 were clustered according to their shared imaging features, whereas EGFR and CDKN2A/B were clustered in the opposite direction.
conclusionsMR imaging features are related to specific molecular alterations and can be used to predict molecular profiles in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.