ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Prognostic importance of acute phase extracellular volume evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of the Extracellular Volume of the Infarction Zone and the Remote Myocardium in Predicting Systolic Dysfunction After the First Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association Between Extracellular Volume Assessed by Cardiac MRI and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI is superior to non-contrast mapping to predict left ventricular remodeling at 6 months after acute myocardial infarction.European radiology · 2024Article
- Role of Cardiovascular Imaging in Risk Assessment: Recent Advances, Gaps in Evidence, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Association of changes in the infarct and remote zone myocardial tissue with cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction: a T1 and T2 mapping study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction (MI) more precisely predicts the functional recovery of infarct-related wall motion abnormalities and left ventricular (LV) remodeling than late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic importance of acute phase ECV in patients with AMI. We evaluated 61 consecutive AMI patients using 3.0 T CMR. CMR examination was performed median 10 days (7-15 days) after PCI. Primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The median follow-up duration was 3.1 years, and MACE occurred in 11 (18%) patients. Although LVEF and % infarct LGE volume were not associated with MACE in this study population, higher infarct ECV predicted the MACE with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.04 (P = 0.02). High global ECV, which was a combined assessment of infarct ECV and remote ECV, also predicted MACE with a HR of 5.24 (P = 0.035). The addition of infarct ECV to remote ECV (global chi-squared score: 1.4) resulted in a significantly increased global chi-squared score (6.7; P = 0.017). Furthermore, after adjusting for the calculated propensity score for high global ECV, it remained an independent predictor of MACE with HR of 5.10 (P = 0.04). The quantification of ECV in the acute phase among AMI patients may provide an incremental prognostic value for predicting MACE beyond that of clinical, angiographic, and functional variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34191203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.