ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2021
Active Versus Passive Flow Control in UVC FILTERs for COVID-19 Containment.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Removal of virus aerosols by the combination of filtration and UV-C irradiation.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2023Article
- Publications About COVID-19 Research by the BME Community.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet radiation as a germicide is widely used in the health field and even in domestic hygiene. Here, we propose an improvement in low-cost portable units of filtration for indoor air, which is based on ultraviolet radiation. In the current technology, to carry out an air filtration with a suspension of aerosols in which there is a likely concentration of pathogens, whether viral, bacterial or molds, the air is forced to pass as close as possible to the ionizing radiation source (near field). Since the optical mass is very small, the desired effect can be achieved in a considerably short time, deactivating the infective potential of these biological agents. The proposal of this work is the regulation of the flow or speed control of passage through these filters by passive elements instead of by electronic control systems. For this, two devices have been designed, simulated, and built, obtaining similar net pathogen inactivation rates under different flow rates. The passive flow control device has demonstrated higher performance in terms of flow rate and lower cost of production since they do not require electronics and are produced with fewer diodes. This passive device has also shown a lower projection of maintenance cost, lower energy consumption rate (higher efficiency), and longer projection of useful life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.