Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191170›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hybrid imaging2020

Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the "shining metal artefact".

Thiago V M Lima, Ujwal Bhure, Maria de Sol Pérez Lago, Yannick Thali, Savo Matijasevic, Justus Roos, Klaus Strobel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hybrid imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thiago V M LimaRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland. thiago.lima@luks.ch.
Ujwal BhureRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Maria de Sol Pérez LagoRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Yannick ThaliRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Savo MatijasevicRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Justus RoosRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Klaus StrobelRadiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel reconstruction algorithms, such as xSPECT Bone, are gaining more and more importance in Nuclear Medicine. With xSPECT Bone, the reconstructed emission image is enhanced by the information obtained in the corresponding CT image. The CT defines tissue classes according to the Hounsfield units. In the iterative reconstruction, each tissue class is handled separately in the forward projection step, and all together in the back projection step. As a consequence, xSPECT Bone reconstruction generates images with improved boundary delineation and better anatomic representation of tracer activity. Applying this technique, however, showed that artefacts may occur, when no uptake regions, like metal implants, exhibit fictitious uniform tracer uptake. Due to limitations in spatial resolution in gamma cameras, the xSPECT Bone reconstructed image resulted in spill-out activity from surrounding high uptake region being uniformly distributed over the metal implants. This new technology of xSPECT Bone reconstruction in general enhances the image quality of SPECT/CT; however, the potential introduction of specific artefacts which inadvertently come along with this new technology and their frequency have not yet been addressed in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to identify and characterize these specific metal artefacts (the so-called shining metal artefact) in order to reduce false positives and avoid potentially misdiagnosing loosened or infected implants. CASE PRESENTATION: In this work, we report five cases imaged with bone SPECT/CT of 5 anatomical regions (foot, elbow, spine, shoulder, ribs and knee). All cases demonstrated "shining metal artefacts" in xSPECT Bone reconstruction.

conclusionWhile xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm significantly improves image quality for the diagnosis of bone and joint disorders with SPECT/CT, specific "shining metal artefacts" caused by the xSPECT Bone have to be recognized in order to avoid image misinterpretation suggesting metallic implant loosening or possible infection. The simultaneous analysis of conventionally reconstructed SPECT images (for Siemens the Flash3D reconstruction) helps to avoid misinterpretation of potential artefacts introduced by xSPECT Bone reconstruction.

Indexed as

Bone SPECT/CTFlash3DMetal implantReconstruction artefactShining metal artefactxSPECT Bone

Identifiers

PMID34191170
PMCPMC8218054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.