ReviewEuropean journal of hybrid imaging2019
Cardiac PET/MRI-an update.
Review in European journal of hybrid imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in Coronary Artery Disease: An Update for Clinicians, with Insights into AI-Guided Integration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- FAPI-Targeted Molecular Imaging: Transforming Insights into Post-Ischemic Myocardial Remodeling?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Review
- Feasibility of position emission tomography derived endocardial wall strain: direct comparison with magnetic resonance using hybridAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Increased [Basic research in cardiology · 2024Article
- Combined Brain-Heart Imaging in Takotsubo Syndrome: Towards a Holistic Patient Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the MRI compatibility of PET detectors modules for organ-specific inserts in a 3T and 7T MRI scanner.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of coronary microvascular diseases (2023 Edition).MedComm · 2023Review
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cardiac PET/MR: Are sophisticated attenuation correction techniques necessary for clinical routine assessments?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Injury in COVID-19: Diagnosis, Risk Stratification and Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Integrated cardiovascular assessment of atherosclerosis using PET/MRI.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is now about 8 years since the first whole-body integrated PET/MRI has been installed. First, reports on technical characteristics and system performance were published. Early after, reports on the first use of PET/MRI in oncological patients were released. Interestingly, the first article on the application in cardiology was a review article, which was published before the first original article was put out. Since then, researchers have gained a lot experience with the PET/MRI in various cardiovascular diseases and an increasing number on auspicious indications is appearing. In this review article, we give an overview on technical updates within these last years with potential impact on cardiac imaging and summarize those scenarios where PET/MRI plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.