Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191140›Full record

Trial reportJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2021

Bacterial cellulose an effective material in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers of the lower limbs.

Liliada G Silva, Amanda V Albuquerque, Flávia C M Pinto, Rafaela S Ferraz-Carvalho, José L A Aguiar, Esdras M Lins

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Wound drainage measurements: a narrative review.Archives of dermatological research · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Bacterial cellulose biomaterials for the treatment of lower limb ulcers.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liliada G SilvaDepartment of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-9019
Amanda V AlbuquerquePost-graduation Program in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-6474
Flávia C M PintoPost-graduation Program in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-9984
Rafaela S Ferraz-CarvalhoPost-graduation Program in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-0116
José L A AguiarPost-graduation Program in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-7359
Esdras M LinsDepartment of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. esdraslins@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-6944
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic venous ulcers (CVU) of the lower limbs (LL) are common and cause psychological changes and significant social impact, as they make the patient susceptible to pain, absence from work and social bonds. Some materials are suggested as dressings for the treatment of CVU, but they are expensive and are generally not available for use in public health services. To evaluate the efficacy of the treatment for lower limbs (LL) chronic venous ulcer (CVU) using bacterial cellulose (BC), gel and multi-perforated film associated. A randomized controlled clinical-intervention study was performed among participants with LL CVU, divided into two groups: experimental (EG), treated with BC wound dressing and control (CG), treated with a cellulose acetate mesh impregnated with essential fatty acids (Rayon®). The participants were followed for 180 days, evaluated according to the MEASURE methodology. Thirty-nine patients were treated, 20 from the EG and 19 from the CG. In both groups, the wound area decreased significantly (p < 0.001), the healing rate was similar to the CG. The mean number of dressing changes in the SG was 18.33 ± 11.78, while in the CG it was 55.24 ± 25.81, p < 0.001. The healing dressing of bacterial cellulose, gel and associated film, when stimulating the epithelization of the lesions, showed a significant reduction in the initial area, with a percentage of cure similar to the Rayon® coverage. In addition to requiring less direct manipulation of ulcers.

Indexed as

Bandages, HydrocolloidAdhesivenessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaCelluloseFatty AcidsFatty Acids, EssentialFemaleGelsHumansLower ExtremityMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedCelluloseFatty AcidsFatty Acids, EssentialGelsrayon, purified

Identifiers

PMID34191140
PMCPMC8245359
OpenAlexW3175987301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.