Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191120›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Do patients' resilience and subjective illness representation predict the outcome of a routine inpatient treatment program of major depressive disorder?

Laura Marschollek, Udo Bonnet

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura MarschollekDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Castrop-Rauxel, Grutholzallee 21, 44577, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
Udo BonnetDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Castrop-Rauxel, Grutholzallee 21, 44577, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. udo.bonnet@uni-due.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adopting a personalized medicine approach beyond genetic/epigenetic profiling within psychiatric diagnostic and treatment is challenging. For the first time, we studied the influence of two patient resources (resilience and illness representation) on the success of an inpatient treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Using a 5-week observational real-world-study, the treatment- success was measured by the difference between the subjective depression- severity (according to the German short form of Beck's Depression-Inventory) at baseline (i.e., days four to six post-admission) and study- endpoint. In the intention-to-treat sample (n = 60, 47.3 ± 12.8 years old; 58% females), the patients' illness representation [measured by the "Krankheitskonzeptskala" (KK)] did not predict their treatment- success. The KK-dimension 'trust-in-doctors' was associated with resilience but not with the treatment-success. Albeit, the patients' resilience (determined by Resilience- Scale, 11-item-version (RS-11)) negatively predicted their positive treatment- success (b = - 0.09, p = 0.017, f

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthInpatientsMajor Depressive DisorderResilience, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAffective disordersEarly sudden gainPersonal resourcesReal-world treatmentSelf-regulationTrust in doctors

Identifiers

PMID34191120
PMCPMC8429153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.