Trial reportJournal of neurology2022
Randomized phase 2 study of perampanel for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perampanel for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of pharmacological and biological therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Therapeutic Challenges and Future Breakthroughs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Precision Medicine to Innovative Trial Design.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Network Dysfunction Precedes Neurodegeneration in a dox-Regulatable TDP-43 Mouse Model of ALS-FTD.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Update on recent advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- How do we get from hyperexcitability to excitotoxicity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Review
- Effect of Serum Perampanel Concentration on Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Progression.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Kainate Receptor Antagonists: Recent Advances and Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-emerging role of AMPA and kainate subtypes of ionotropic glutamate receptors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Neuronal Hyperexcitability and Free Radical Toxicity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Established and Future Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Research on Past and Future Therapeutic Strategies Devoted to Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Neuroprotection and Disease Modification by Astrocytes and Microglia in Parkinson Disease.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- New developments and opportunities in drugs being trialed for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2020 to 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Mechanism of the Curative Effect of Wen-Shen-Jian-Pi Prescription in the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- RNA Editing: A New Therapeutic Target in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurological Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Evidence-Based Research Strategy of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (SALS).
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 2 clinical study was conducted at 12 sites. Patients with probable or definite ALS as defined by revised El Escorial criteria were enrolled. Sixty-six patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 4 mg perampanel, or 8 mg perampanel daily for 48 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the trial period. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score after 48 weeks of treatment.
resultsOne patient withdrew before starting the treatment. Of 65 patients included, 18 of 22 patients randomized to placebo (82%), 14 of 22 patients randomized to 4 mg perampanel (64%), and 7 of 21 patients randomized to 8 mg perampanel (33%) completed the trial. There was a significant difference in the change of ALSFRS-R scores [- 8.4 (95% CI - 13.9 to - 2.9); p = 0.015] between the placebo and the perampanel 8 mg group, primarily due to worsening of the bulbar subscore in the perampanel 8 mg group. Serious AEs were more frequent in the perampanel 8 mg group than in the placebo group (p = 0.0483).
conclusionsPerampanel was associated with a significant decline in ALSFRS-R score and was linked to worsening of the bulbar subscore in the 8 mg group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.