Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191070›Full record

ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2021

Pituitary Radiosurgery for Management of Intractable Pain: Tokyo Women's Medical University Experience and Literature Review.

Mikhail F Chernov, Motohiro Hayashi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikhail F ChernovFaculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Motohiro HayashiFaculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. gkrmoto@gmail.com.
Tokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical or chemical hypophysectomy has historically shown good effectiveness in management of intractable pain but has often been accompanied by serious complications. In contrast, high-dose irradiation of the pituitary gland and stalk provides comparable analgesic effects and is associated with minimal morbidity. Although its physiological mechanism remains elusive, pituitary radiosurgery using the Gamma Knife has demonstrated high clinical efficacy and safety in cases of both cancer pain and noncancer pain. According to the available data, this treatment provides at least a temporary analgesic effect in >80% of patients, usually within hours to days after the procedure. Although the pain relief is most prominent and durable in cases of metastatic bone disease, it is not limited to that pathological condition or to cases of hormone-dependent cancers. Nevertheless, the low-quality studies reported to date cannot support any meaningful clinical recommendations on use of pituitary radiosurgery. Therefore, additional well-elaborated clinical and basic investigations, preferably performed in a multi-institutional and prospective fashion, are clearly needed and may bolster further developments of this highly promising treatment modality.

Indexed as

Intractable PainRadiosurgeryFemaleHumansPituitary GlandProspective StudiesTokyoTreatment OutcomeUniversitiesAnalgesic effectsCancer painGamma Knife radiosurgeryHypophysectomyMalignant visceral painMetastatic bone diseaseOutcomePain managementPhysiological mechanismsPituitary radiosurgeryPoststroke thalamic pain

Identifiers

PMID34191070
OpenAlexW3175437080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.