Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34191042›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2021

[Tumors of the central nervous system in children and adolescents].

G Hahn, H-J Mentzel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Pediatric supratentorial brain tumors].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G HahnBereich für Kinderradiologie, Institut und Poliklinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. gabriele.hahn@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
H-J MentzelSektion Kinderradiologie, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Jena University Hospital · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueBrain tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood and the most frequent cancer after leukemia. The incidence is continuously increasing. The WHO classification of brain tumors, valid since 2016, is now based on the combination of histological and molecular genetic diagnostics. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsDiagnostics are mainly performed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); only in emergencies with computed tomography (CT). METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Diffusion and susceptibility weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and spectroscopy are used. PERFORMANCE: Improved diagnosis regarding dignity, size determination, adjacency assessment, and morphological description of tumor composition. ACHIEVEMENTS: Modern MRI with functional techniques is now the gold standard for differential diagnosis and staging of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in pediatrics.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentCentral Nervous SystemChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiffusionMultimodal imagingPediatric brain tumorsPerfusionSpectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34191042
OpenAlexW3177236737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.