Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34190899›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2021

COVID-19 and social distancing among children and adolescents in Brazil.

Fernando C Barros, Fernando P Hartwig, Aluísio J D Barros, Ana M B Menezes, Bernardo L Horta, Cláudio J Struchiner, Luis Paulo Vidaletti, Mariangela F Silveira, Marilia A Mesenburg, Odir A Delagostin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pediatric COVID-19: clinical and epidemiological data of 1303 cases in a general hospital in Brazil.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando C BarrosUniversidade Católica de Pelotas. Curso de Pós-Graduação em Saúde no Ciclo Vital. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-1746
Fernando P HartwigUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-0710
Aluísio J D BarrosUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-8729
Ana M B MenezesUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2996-9427
Bernardo L HortaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-412X
Cláudio J StruchinerFundação Getúlio Vargas. Escola de Matemática Aplicada. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-847X
Luis Paulo VidalettiUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-6841
Mariangela F SilveiraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-7139
Marilia A MesenburgUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-4193
Odir A DelagostinUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-4088
Pedro C HallalUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-6461
Cesar G VictoraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Social. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-2180
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRFundação Getulio Vargas · BRUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the adherence to measures of social distancing in children and adolescents studied in three national surveys conducted in Brazil between May-June 2020.

methodsThree national serological surveys were conducted in 133 sentinel cities located in all 27 Federative Units. Multistage probability sampling was used to select 250 individuals per city. The total sample size in age ranges 0-9 and 10-19 years old are of 4,263 and 8,024 individuals, respectively. Information on children or adolescents was gathered with a data collection app, and a rapid point-of-case test for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted on a finger prick blood sample.

resultsThe adjusted prevalence of antibodies was 2.9% (2.2-3.6) among children 0-9 years, 2.2% (1.8-2.6) among adolescents 10-19 years, and 3.0% (2.7-3.3) among adults 20+years. Prevalence of antibodies was higher among poor children and adolescents compared to those of rich families. Adherence to social distancing measures was seen in 72.4% (71.9-73.8) of families with children, 60.8% (59.6-61.9) for adolescents, and 57.4% (56.9-57.8) for adults. For not leaving the house except for essential matters the proportions were 81.7% (80.5-82.9), 70.6% (69.6-61.9), and 65.1% (64.7-65.5), respectively. Among children and adolescents, social distancing was strongly associated with socioeconomic status, being much higher in the better-off families.

conclusionsThe prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 showed comparable levels among children, adolescents, and adults. Adherence to social distancing measures was more prevalent in children, followed by adolescents. There were important socioeconomic differences in the adherence to social distancing among children and adolescents.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultBrazilChildCitiesHumansPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34190899
PMCPMC8225319
OpenAlexW3174430216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.