Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34190825›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)

Cannabinoid receptor gene polymorphisms and cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia and controls.

Rodrigo Ferretjans, Renan P de Souza, Bruna Panizzutti, Pâmela Ferrari, Lucas Mantovani, Salvina M de Campos-Carli, Rafael R Santos, Fernanda C Guimarães, Antonio L Teixeira, Clarissa S Gama and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Derivation of a health-based guidance value for ΔEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rodrigo FerretjansPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-6534
Renan P de SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-4432
Bruna PanizzuttiThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-734X
Pâmela FerrariPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento (PPGPSIQ), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lucas MantovaniPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-6769
Salvina M de Campos-CarliPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rafael R SantosPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Fernanda C GuimarãesPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Antonio L TeixeiraInstituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-5422
Clarissa S GamaCentre for Molecular and Medical Research, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-9690
João V SalgadoPrograma Interdisciplinar de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-4729
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRBarwon Health · AUSanta Casa Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that genetic variations of cannabinoid receptors contribute to the pathophysiology of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

methodsIn this genetic association case-control study, cannabinoid receptor polymorphisms CNR1 rs12720071 and CNR2 rs2229579 were tested for association with neurocognitive performance in 69 patients with schizophrenia and 45 healthy controls. Neurocognition was assessed by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS).

resultsWe found a consistent association between CNR1 rs12720071 polymorphism and the cognitive performance of patients in several cognitive domains. Patients with C/C polymorphism presented significantly worse performance in motor speed, verbal fluency, attention/processing speed and reasoning/problem solving.

conclusionAlthough limited, our data support the hypothesis that CNR1 variations may be associated with the pathogenesis of cognitive deficits of schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaCase-Control StudiesCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsPolymorphism, GeneticReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2CNR1 protein, humanCNR2 protein, humanReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2

Identifiers

PMID34190825
PMCPMC8827365
OpenAlexW3173379667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.