Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34190434›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2021

Nephron-sparing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Jason M Farrow, Sean Q Kern, Gustavo M Gryzinski, Chandru P Sundaram

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason M FarrowDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. jmfarrow@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6850-4174
Sean Q KernDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-5726
Gustavo M GryzinskiDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6952-8207
Chandru P SundaramDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2885-1678
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is uncommon and presents unique challenges for diagnosis and management. Nephroureterectomy has been the preferred management option, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Nephron-sparing treatments are a valuable alternative and provide similar efficacy in select cases. A PubMed literature review was performed in English language publications using the following search terms: urothelial carcinoma, upper tract, nephron-sparing, intraluminal and systemic therapy. Contemporary papers published within the last 10 years were primarily included. Where encountered, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were given priority, as were randomized controlled trials for newer treatments. Core guidelines were referenced and citations reviewed for inclusion. A summary of epidemiological data, clinical diagnosis, staging, and treatments focusing on nephron-sparing approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are outlined. Nephron-sparing management strategies are viable options to consider in patients with favorable features of UTUC. Adjunctive therapies are being investigated but the data remains mixed. Protocol variability and dosage differences limit statistical interpretation. New mechanisms to improve treatment dwell times in the upper tracts are being designed with promising preliminary results. Studies investigating systemic therapies are ongoing but implications for nephron-sparing management are uncertain. Nephron-sparing management is an acceptable treatment modality best suited for favorable disease. More work is needed to determine if intraluminal and/or systemic therapies can further optimize treatment outcomes beyond resection alone.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBCG VaccineCarcinoma, Transitional CellDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansKidney NeoplasmsMitomycinNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyNephronsUreteral NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsBCG VaccineDeoxycytidineGemcitabineMitomycinCarcinoma, transitional cellDrug therapyOrgan sparing treatmentsUrinary tract

Identifiers

PMID34190434
PMCPMC8246013
OpenAlexW3175309984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.