Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34190361›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2021

Romosozumab improves lumbar spine bone mass and bone strength parameters relative to alendronate in postmenopausal women: results from the Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH) trial.

Jacques P Brown, Klaus Engelke, Tony M Keaveny, Arkadi Chines, Roland Chapurlat, A Joseph Foldes, Xavier Nogues, Roberto Civitelli, Tobias De Villiers, Fabio Massari and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01631214 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, International, Randomized, Double-blind, Alendronate-controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2012 to 2017Enrolled4,093ConditionsPostmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisArmsRomosozumab, Alendronate, Placebo to Romosozumab, Placebo to Alendronate
NCT06720350 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Romosozumab and Denosumab Combined Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients with Multiple Fragility Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsOsteoporosis in Post-menopausal WomenArmsRomosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy, Romosozumab Prefilled Syringe [Evenity], Denosumab (Prolia)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Romosozumab improves microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  5. 3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of romosozumab on the peripheral and axial skeleton in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk: real-world evidence from DXA and HR-pQCT data.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Different Lrp5-HBM mutations induce magnitude- and surface-selective effects that are not explained by receptor trafficking.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Romosozumab super-responders in clinical practice: insights from a large Italian multicenter cohort of women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  11. Clarifying clinically treatment-naive status for osteoporosis patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Efficacy and safety of romosozumab in patients with chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment patterns of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Denmark: findings from the ROmosozumab in Scandinavia real-world Evidence Study (ROSES).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Jacques P BrownCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-788X
Klaus EngelkeBioclinica, Hamburg, Germany.
Tony M KeavenyDepartments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Arkadi ChinesAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Roland ChapurlatInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unités Mixtes de Recherche (UMR) 1033, Université de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-6385
A Joseph FoldesOsteoporosis Center, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Xavier NoguesInstitut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto CivitelliMusculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4076-4315
Tobias De VilliersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Fabio MassariInstituto de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cristiano A F ZerbiniCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica, São Paulo, Brazil.
Zhenxun WangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Mary K OatesAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Christopher RecknorUnited Osteoporosis Centers, Gainesville, Georgia, USA.
Cesar LibanatiUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-7839
Amgen (United States) · USBone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation · USCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CACentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHadassah Medical Center · ILInstituto de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Metabólicas · ARStellenbosch University · ZAUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH) trial (NCT01631214; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01631214) showed that romosozumab for 1 year followed by alendronate led to larger areal bone mineral density (aBMD) gains and superior fracture risk reduction versus alendronate alone. aBMD correlates with bone strength but does not capture all determinants of bone strength that might be differentially affected by various osteoporosis therapeutic agents. We therefore used quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and finite element analysis (FEA) to assess changes in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone volume, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone strength with romosozumab versus alendronate in a subset of ARCH patients. In ARCH, 4093 postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis received monthly romosozumab 210 mg sc or weekly oral alendronate 70 mg for 12 months, followed by open-label weekly oral alendronate 70 mg for ≥12 months. Of these, 90 (49 romosozumab, 41 alendronate) enrolled in the QCT/FEA imaging substudy. QCT scans at baseline and at months 6, 12, and 24 were assessed to determine changes in integral (total), cortical, and trabecular lumbar spine vBMD and corresponding bone strength by FEA. Additional outcomes assessed include changes in aBMD, bone volume, and BMC. Romosozumab caused greater gains in lumbar spine integral, cortical, and trabecular vBMD and BMC than alendronate at months 6 and 12, with the greater gains maintained upon transition to alendronate through month 24. These improvements were accompanied by significantly greater increases in FEA bone strength (p < 0.001 at all time points). Most newly formed bone was accrued in the cortical compartment, with romosozumab showing larger absolute BMC gains than alendronate (p < 0.001 at all time points). In conclusion, romosozumab significantly improved bone mass and bone strength parameters at the lumbar spine compared with alendronate. These results are consistent with greater vertebral fracture risk reduction observed with romosozumab versus alendronate in ARCH and provide insights into structural determinants of this differential treatment effect. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAlendronateAntibodies, MonoclonalBone DensityFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraePostmenopauseAlendronateAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsromosozumabBONE MINERAL CONTENTBONE STRENGTHFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISPOSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSISQUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Identifiers

PMID34190361
PMCPMC9292813
OpenAlexW3174854556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.