Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189938›Full record

ReviewChronic respiratory disease

Sexual health communication in COPD: The role, contents and design of patient information leaflets.

Sandra Esperanza Rubio-Rask, Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sexual Health in COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of a Communication Instrument to Address Sexuality in COPD: COSY.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra Esperanza Rubio-RaskDepartment of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9181-5170
Ingeborg Farver-VestergaardDepartment of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Ole HilbergDepartment of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Anders LøkkeDepartment of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding need for support and information among people with COPD is important for the delivery of patient-centred care. Especially regarding intimacy matters, many people wish to remain sexually active but may be struggling to find out how, as information and communication regarding sexual health is scarce. This is especially true when it comes to people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present review seeks to provide an overview of the role, contents and design of patient information leaflets (PILs) and discuss their application in sexual health communication for COPD. Based on the literature, a number of key points in the design of high-quality PILs are suggested, and important areas for the improvement of patients-clinician communication are highlighted. While PILs is a commonly used format to provide information in healthcare, other formats, e.g. video and podcasts, could be explored. Prioritizing the development of material to support communication in the future is necessary to address the needs of both patients and caregivers and to support clinicians in initiating conversations about sexual health and intimacy matters.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSexual HealthCaregiversCommunicationHumansPatient-Centered Carechronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecommunicationCOPDleafletsexual health

Identifiers

PMID34189938
PMCPMC8252346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.