Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189700›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Learning curve and global benchmark values of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: results of first 100 cases of a newly trained surgeon in an Italian center of excellence.

Antonio Vitiello, Giovanna Berardi, Nunzio Velotti, Vincenzo Schiavone, Mario Musella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Technical variability and safety of sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide survey of bariatric centers in Poland.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio VitielloAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. antoniovitiello_@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-7112
Giovanna BerardiAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Nunzio VelottiAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo SchiavoneAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Mario MusellaAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate whether the learning curve for sleeve gastrectomy could be completed after 50 cases. First 100 patients undergoing LSG under a newly trained laparoscopic surgeon were included in this study and divided into two groups of 50 consecutive patients each. Perioperative outcomes were compared to recently introduced global benchmarks. Short-term weight loss was calculated as Total Weight Loss Percent (%TWL) and complications were classified in accordance with the Clavien-Dindo classification. CUSUM analysis was performed for operative time and hospital stay. Mean preoperative age and BMI were 41.8 ± 10.3 years and 42.9 ± 5.4 kg/m

Indexed as

LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidSurgeonsAdultBenchmarkingGastrectomyHumansItalyLearning CurveMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsGlobal benchmarksLearning curveSleeve gastrectomySurgical training

Identifiers

PMID34189700
PMCPMC8500908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.