ArticleFood chemistry: X2021
Assessing the sensory and physicochemical impact of reverse osmosis membrane technology to dealcoholize two different beer styles.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Alcoholic and Low-Alcohol Beer: Regulatory Complexity, Market Expansion and Technical Bottlenecks in Biological and Physical Dealcoholisation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Flavorful Microbial Fermentation: Metabolic, Flavoromic, and Sensory Analysis Insights Into Probiotic-Enhanced Catharina Sour Beer WithInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Applications of Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membrane Process in Wine and Beer Industry.Membranes · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pilot scale dealcoholisation unit fitted with reverse osmosis (RO) membranes was used to directly compare two beer matrices (stout, lager, ~ 5% ABV) and their dealcoholized counterparts (~0.5% ABV), for physicochemical properties (volatiles, pH, ABV, polyphenols, bitterness) and sensory profiles using a trained descriptive panel (n = 12). The efficiency and consistency of RO membranes were evaluated by replicate dealcoholisation trials (n = 3) for each beer. Statistical analysis revealed significant reductions (p < 0.05) in key volatile compounds with linear structures (ethyl octanoate, octan-1-ol) compared to those with increased levels of branching (3-methylbutyl acetate, 2-methylpropan-1-ol). Significant reductions (p < 0.0001) in 'fruity/estery', 'alcoholic/solvent', 'malty', 'sweetness' and 'body' sensory attributes were also discovered. Finally, longer processing times for the stout across replicate trials suggested membrane clogging, whilst differences in volatile reduction suggested membrane fouling. This novel research proposes compound structure, rather than compound size, impacts RO membrane permeability and resulting sensory quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.