Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189355›Full record

ArticleBrain circulation

Transradial access for anterior circulation deployment of pipeline embolization device: A case report, literature review, and technical note.

Cassidy D Werner, Mansour Mathkour, Tyler A Scullen, Erin P McCormack, Joseph D Lockwood, Peter S Amenta

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassidy D WernerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Mansour MathkourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Tyler A ScullenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Erin P McCormackDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Joseph D LockwoodDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Peter S AmentaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Tulane Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common femoral artery (CFA) transfemoral access (TFA) has been the traditional route for neuroendovascular intervention with flow diversion including the pipeline embolization device (PED) for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. Successful deployment requires significant catheter support, thus making alternative access challenging. A 56-year-old-female presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to a large ruptured posterior communicating artery (PCOM) aneurysm as well as found to have an unruptured left superior cerebellar artery (SCA) aneurysm. Endovascular embolization of PCOM aneurysm via TFA was complicated by a right CFA pseudoaneurysm. The SCA aneurysm was treated 8 weeks later via left TFA with consequent development of a left CFA pseudoaneurysm. Contrasted magnetic resonance angiography revealed recurrence at the neck of the PCOM aneurysm at 4-month follow-up, treated via transradial access (TRA) PED flow diversion to avoid additional groin complications. Anatomic, procedural, and clinical considerations for TRA anterior circulation flow diversion using the PED are reviewed.

Indexed as

Anterior circulationcommon femoral arterydeviceneuroendovascularpipeline embolizationtransradial

Identifiers

PMID34189355
PMCPMC8191533
OpenAlexW3168769800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.