Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189283›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2021

Impact of transitioning to an online course - A report from the ESTRO gyn teaching course.

L T Tan, K Tanderup, A Nappa, P Petric, I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz, M Serban, J V Swamidas, M Palmu, S L Duke, U Mahantshetty and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Successful implementation of online educational lectures of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  3. Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0 for Residents: Implementation and Outcomes.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  4. COVID-19 Effects on Medical Education: A Viral Transfer of Knowledge to Radiation Oncology.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

L T TanCambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
K TanderupAarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
A NappaEuropean Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Brussels, Belgium.
P PetricInstitute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
I M Jürgenliemk-SchulzUniversity Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M SerbanMcGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
J V SwamidasTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
M PalmuEuropean Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Brussels, Belgium.
S L DukeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
U MahantshettyTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
N NesvacilMedical University of Vienna, Austria.
R C PötterMedical University of Vienna, Austria.
R A NoutErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEuropean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · BEMedical University of Vienna · ATTata Memorial Hospital · INAarhus University Hospital · DKErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2020, the ESTRO course on image-guided radiotherapy and chemotherapy in gynaecological cancer was converted into an online version due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper describes the change process and evaluates the impact on participants compared with previous live courses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 2019 live course contained 41 h of educational content, comprising 33 h of synchronous activities (lectures, interactive activities, videos) and 8 h of homework (contouring, dose planning). For the online course, the lectures were provided as pre-course material (11 mandatory, 22 optional). Contouring/dose planning homework was unchanged. The synchronous sessions were reconfigured as six 2-hour webinars (total educational content ~38 h).Participant numbers/characteristics, engagement and satisfaction for six live courses and the online course were compared.

resultsParticipant numbers for the online and live courses were similar (90 vs. mean 96). There were more participants from outside Europe (28% vs. mean 18%) and more non-doctors (47% vs. mean 33%). Proportion of participants responding to the pre-course questionnaire was similar (77% vs. mean 78%) but post-course questionnaire response was lower (62% vs. mean 92%).43% participants viewed ≥75% of mandatory lectures before the webinars. 86% viewed the optional lectures. Submissions of contouring and dose planning homework was higher (contouring 77%-90% vs. 56%-69%, dose planning 74%-89% vs. 29%-57%).96% (47/49) participants rated the online course as Excellent (43%) or Good (53%). Overall satisfaction was similar (4.4 vs. mean 4.6).

conclusionParticipant satisfaction and engagement with the online course remained high despite less contact time with faculty.

Indexed as

CervixEducationESTROImage-guided brachytherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapyOnlineTraining

Identifiers

PMID34189283
PMCPMC8220299
OpenAlexW3167575612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.