Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189260›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2021

Evaluation of Patient Experience During Virtual and In-Person Urgent Care Visits: Time and Cost Analysis.

Saif Khairat, Xi Lin, Songzi Liu, Zhaohui Man, Tanzila Zaman, Barbara Edson, Robert Gianforcaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors Affecting Family Caregivers' Satisfaction During Virtual Care Visits.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saif KhairatCarolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-2946
Xi LinDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-8341
Songzi LiuSchool of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Zhaohui ManSchool of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Tanzila ZamanCarolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Barbara EdsonUNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Robert GianforcaroUNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urgent care (UC) is one of the fastest growing venues of health care delivery for nonemergent conditions. This study compared the patient experience during virtual and in-person urgent care visits. We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with the same diagnosis during Virtual Urgent Care (VUC) and in-person UC visits with the same diagnosis with regard to time and cost over a period of one year. We recorded and analyzed 16 685 urgent care visits: In-person UC (n = 14 734), VUC (n = 1262). Significant differences were found in the average total time for a visit in an in-person UC (70.89 minutes), and VUC (9.38 minutes). The average total cost of VUC ($49) and in-person UC ($142.657) differed significantly. Significant difference was found between UC turnaround time and VC turnaround time (Dependent variable (DV): 53.77,

Indexed as

cost analysisexperiencepatienttelehealthurgent carevirtualwait times

Identifiers

PMID34189260
PMCPMC8205332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.