ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2021
Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental findings are frequent in shoulder CT and MRI scans and increase with age.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Emergence of Incidentalomas Following Chest CT Screening for COVID-19 Infection: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Thyroid Incidentalomas in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023Article
- Benign incidental cardiac findings in chest and cardiac CT imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Decrease in the number of new cancer diagnoses during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - cohort study of 3.5 million individuals in western Poland.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19.
methodsIn this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25-April 23, 2020). Original radiology reports were evaluated retrospectively for the description of IFs, which were defined as any finding in the report not related to the purpose of the scan. Documented IFs were categorized according to clinical relevance into minor and potentially significant IFs and according to anatomical location into pulmonary, mediastinal, cardiovascular, breast, upper abdominal and skeletal categories. IFs were reported as frequencies and percentages; descriptive statistics were used.
resultsIn total 197 IFs were detected in 126 patients (54 % of the participants). Patients with IFs were on average older (54.0 years old, SD 16.6) than patients without IFs (44.8 years old, SD 14.6, P < 0.05). In total 60 potentially significant IFs were detected in 53 patients (23 % of the participants). Most often reported were coronary artery calcifications (n = 23, 38 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 10 % of the total study population), suspicious breast nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population) and pulmonary nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population).
conclusionA considerable number of IFs were detected by using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19, of which a substantial percentage (23 %) is potentially clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.