Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189061›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2021

Daily Ecological Momentary Assessments of happy and sad moods in people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders: What do participants who are never sad think about their activities and abilities?

Sara E Jones, Raeanne C Moore, Colin A Depp, Robert A Ackerman, Amy E Pinkham, Philip D Harvey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ten years ofSchizophrenia research. Cognition · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mild Cognitive Impairment, But Not HIV Status, is Related to Reduced Awareness of Level of Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara E JonesUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Raeanne C MooreUCSD Health Sciences Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Colin A DeppUCSD Health Sciences Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Robert A AckermanUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Amy E PinkhamUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Philip D HarveyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Introspective Accuracy, Bias, and Everyday Functioning in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH112620 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PINKHAM, AMY · 2018 to 2021
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople with schizophrenia have challenges in their self-assessments of everyday functioning and those who report no sadness also tend to overestimate their everyday functional abilities. While previous studies were cross-sectional, this study related longitudinal assessments of sadness to self-reports of abilities in domains of everyday functioning and cognitive abilities.

methods71 people with bipolar illness (BPI) were compared to 102 people with schizophrenia (SCZ). Participants were sampled 3 times per day for 30 days with a smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) survey. Each survey asked where they were, with whom they were, what they were doing, and if they were sad. Performance based assessments of executive functioning, social competence, and everyday activities were collected after the EMA period, at which time the participants and observers were asked to provide ratings of three different domains of everyday functioning and neurocognitive ability.

results18% of participants with SCZ reported that they were never sad on any one of the 90 EMA surveys. Reports of never being sad were associated with overestimated functioning compared to observers and SCZ participants who reported that they were never sad were more commonly home and alone than both SCZ participants who reported occasional sadness and participants with BPI. These participants reported being significantly happier than all people in the study. IMPLICATIONS: Reporting that you were never sad was associated with overestimation of everyday functioning and cognitive abilities. Although participants who were never sad did not perform more poorly on objective measures than those were occasionally sad, their self-assessed functioning was significantly elevated. These data suggest that negative symptoms constructs such as reduced emotional experience need to consider reduced ability to subjectively evaluate emotional experience as a feature of negative symptoms.

Indexed as

ActivityBipolar disorderDisabilityEcological Momentary AssessmentSadnessSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID34189061
PMCPMC8219985
OpenAlexW3174567212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.