Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34189001›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Indications of Uteri Less Than Fourteen Weeks Size Versus More Than Fourteen Weeks Size: A Comparative Study.

Anupama Bahadur, Mamta Kumawat, Latika Chawla, Dhriti Kapur, Yogesh Bahurupi, Rajlaxmi Mundhra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anupama BahadurObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Mamta KumawatObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Latika ChawlaObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Dhriti KapurObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, IND.
Yogesh BahurupiCommunity and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Rajlaxmi MundhraObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of robotic hysterectomy for benign indications in patients with small size (<14 weeks) versus large size (>14 weeks) uterus. Methods This prospective study was conducted in a single centre from August 2018 to January 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh (Uttarakhand). Surgical outcomes of 216 patients who underwent a robotic hysterectomy in our institution for benign indications were analysed. Women opting for definitive surgical management by minimally invasive technique were divided into two groups according to the size of the uterus less than 14 weeks (group 1) versus more than equal to 14 weeks (group 2). Data collected in both groups included intra-operative and post-operative parameters, length of hospital stay and morbidity if any. Results The demographic profile was comparable in both groups. The mean estimated blood loss was 180.78 ±68.0 ml (range, 10-340 ml) in group 1 and 253.49 ±57ml (range, 60-360 ml) in group 2 (p-value < 0.0001). However, the fall in haemoglobin level after 24 hours of surgery was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. The total duration of surgery in group 1 was 97.86 ± 12.0 minutes (range, 78-132 minutes) and in group 2 was 116.60 ± 15.4 minutes (range, 97-156 minutes), the difference being statically significant (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 103±2.1). Console time in group 1 was 43.84 ±6.0 minutes (range, 34-57 minutes) and in group 2 53.22 ±5.5 minutes (range, 44-66 minutes), the difference being statistically significant (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 46.57±0.97). There was no difference observed in terms of intra-operative and post-operative complications between the two groups. Conclusion The total duration of surgery and estimated blood loss were directly proportional to the size of the uterus. However, complication rate, hospital stay and requirement of post-op analgesia were comparable in both groups. Robotic surgery in a larger uterus is a feasible option in terms of better surgical outcomes and postoperative course. Thus, robotic hysterectomy in women with a large uterus is a suitable approach in the narrow region of the pelvis.

Indexed as

benign hysterectomyda vinci surgical systemgynaecologyhysterectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34189001
PMCPMC8233156
OpenAlexW3165626589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.