Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188974›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Middle Cerebral Artery Duplication: A Near Miss for Stroke Thrombectomy.

Elliot Pressman, Sheyar Amin, Swetha Renati, Maxim Mokin

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliot PressmanNeurosurgery & Brain Repair, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, USA.
Sheyar AminNeurology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, USA.
Swetha RenatiNeurology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, USA.
Maxim MokinNeurosurgery & Brain Repair, University of South Florida Health, Tampa, USA.
University of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle cerebral artery (MCA) duplication is a rare anatomical arrangement where an anomalous MCA arises from the distal end of the internal carotid artery. If occluded, a duplicated MCA can present with significant deficits comparable to an occlusion of the M2 vessel without obvious findings on vessel imaging via computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography. A female in her 30s with no past medical history presented with suspected acute stroke 8 hours after last known normal-featuring new-onset right-sided weakness, facial droop, and slurred speech, which corresponds to a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 13. Head CTA was interpreted as preserved patency of intracranial vessels. CT perfusion was suggestive of a large area of penumbra. Emergent cerebral angiography demonstrated MCA duplication on the left side with proximal occlusion of the M1 branch supplying the traditional M2 territory. Mechanical thrombectomy achieved grade TICI 2b reperfusion. Throughout her hospital stay, her aphasia started to resolve, and the patient was discharged to inpatient rehabilitation. This case presents a diagnostic challenge and learning point in identifying similar patients in the future. We suggest the clinician, given a high clinical suspicion for large vessel occlusion, even if CTA is negative, to continue with CT perfusion to not miss stroke in patients with MCA duplication. If CT perfusion shows substantial deficit in an MCA distribution, one must consider that the patient may have an MCA duplication.

Indexed as

anatomic variantduplicationmiddle cerebral arterystrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID34188974
PMCPMC8232920
OpenAlexW3165180931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.