Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188879›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Seasonal patterns of spatial fidelity and temporal consistency in the distribution and movements of a migratory ungulate.

Kyle Joly, Eliezer Gurarie, D Alexander Hansen, Matthew D Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Loss of flockmates weakens winter site fidelity in golden-crowned sparrows (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Increasing fire frequency and severity will increase habitat loss for a boreal forest indicator species.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle JolyGates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve Arctic Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service Fairbanks AK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-7452
Eliezer GurarieDepartment of Biology University of Maryland College Park MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-9674
D Alexander HansenDivision of Wildlife Conservation Alaska Department of Fish and Game Kotzebue AK USA.
Matthew D CameronGates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve Arctic Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service Fairbanks AK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-4491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How animals use their range can have physiological, ecological, and demographic repercussions, as well as impact management decisions, species conservation, and human society. Fidelity, the predictable return to certain places, can improve fitness if it is associated with high-quality habitat or helps enable individuals to locate heterogenous patches of higher-quality habitat within a lower-quality habitat matrix. Our goal was to quantify patterns of fidelity at different spatial scales to better understand the relative plasticity of habitat use of a vital subsistence species that undergoes long-distance migrations. We analyzed a decade (2010-2019) of GPS data from 240 adult, female Western Arctic Herd (WAH) caribou (

Indexed as

adhesioncaribouconservationfidelitymigrationproductivityRangiferspace useWestern Arctic Herd

Identifiers

PMID34188879
PMCPMC8216956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.