Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188862›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.

Sophie Kratschmer, Bärbel Pachinger, René Gaigher, James S Pryke, Julia van Schalkwyk, Michael J Samways, Annalie Melin, Temitope Kehinde, Johann G Zaller, Silvia Winter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie KratschmerInstitute of Zoology University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6538-694X
Bärbel PachingerInstitute for Integrative Nature Conservation Research University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-2752
René GaigherDepartment Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-8634
James S PrykeDepartment Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-5744
Julia van SchalkwykDepartment Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-3425
Michael J SamwaysDepartment Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4237-6025
Annalie MelinCompton Herbarium South African National Biodiversity Institute Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3393-1701
Temitope KehindeDepartment of Zoology Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2993-2373
Johann G ZallerInstitute of Zoology University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-7378
Silvia WinterInstitute of Plant Protection University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU) Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-7774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter-rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter-row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter-row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter-rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter-rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500-m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees' proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray-disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter-rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter-rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes.

Indexed as

Apiformescountry comparisonfloral traitsfunctional traitsmanagement intensitiesviticultural landscapes

Identifiers

PMID34188862
PMCPMC8216979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.