Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188805›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2021

Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: Present trends and future directions.

Peter Contos, Jennifer L Wood, Nicholas P Murphy, Heloise Gibb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rewilding: history, intervention and the quest for immanence.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter ContosDepartment of Ecology Environment and Evolution, and Centre for Future Landscapes School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Vic. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-5790
Jennifer L WoodDepartment of Ecology Environment and Evolution, and Centre for Future Landscapes School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Nicholas P MurphyDepartment of Ecology Environment and Evolution, and Centre for Future Landscapes School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Heloise GibbDepartment of Ecology Environment and Evolution, and Centre for Future Landscapes School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Vic. Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoration ecology has historically focused on reconstructing communities of highly visible taxa while less visible taxa, such as invertebrates and microbes, are ignored. This is problematic as invertebrates and microbes make up the vast bulk of biodiversity and drive many key ecosystem processes, yet they are rarely actively reintroduced following restoration, potentially limiting ecosystem function and biodiversity in these areas.In this review, we discuss the current (limited) incorporation of invertebrates and microbes in restoration and rewilding projects. We argue that these groups should be actively rewilded during restoration to improve biodiversity, ecosystem function outcomes, and highlight how they can be used to greater effect in the future. For example, invertebrates and microbes are easily manipulated, meaning whole communities can potentially be rewilded through habitat transplants in a practice that we refer to as "whole-of-community" rewilding.We provide a framework for whole-of-community rewilding and describe empirical case studies as practical applications of this under-researched restoration tool that land managers can use to improve restoration outcomes.We hope this new perspective on whole-of-community restoration will promote applied research into restoration that incorporates all biota, irrespective of size, while also enabling a better understanding of fundamental ecological theory, such as colonization and competition trade-offs. This may be a necessary consideration as invertebrates that are important in providing ecosystem services are declining globally; targeting invertebrate communities during restoration may be crucial in stemming this decline.

Indexed as

ecological restorationecosystem functioninvertebrate conservationinvertebratesmicrobesrevegetationrewildingsoil inoculationwhole‐of‐community rewilding

Identifiers

PMID34188805
PMCPMC8216958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.