ReviewEcology and evolution2021
Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: Present trends and future directions.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rewilding: history, intervention and the quest for immanence.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2026Article
- Fecal microbiota and microbial community transplantation:Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Integrating belowground recovery into tropical forest restoration design and monitoring.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Shifting community assembly mechanisms in soil eukaryotes over successional time and their implications for restoration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Practical applications of soil microbiota to improve ecosystem restoration: current knowledge and future directions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of growth promoters for the seagrass (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Rewilding soil and litter invertebrates and fungi increases decomposition rates and alters detritivore communities.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- An Environmental DNA Primer for Microbial and Restoration Ecology.Microbial ecology · 2023Review
- Characterizing Effects of Microbial Biostimulants and Whole-Soil Inoculums for Native Plant Revegetation.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Environmental response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soybean cultivation at a regional scale.Mycorrhiza · 2022Article
- Soil inoculum identity and rate jointly steer microbiomes and plant communities in the field.ISME communications · 2022Article
- Engineering microbial technologies for environmental sustainability: choices to make.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: Present trends and future directions.Ecology and evolution · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoration ecology has historically focused on reconstructing communities of highly visible taxa while less visible taxa, such as invertebrates and microbes, are ignored. This is problematic as invertebrates and microbes make up the vast bulk of biodiversity and drive many key ecosystem processes, yet they are rarely actively reintroduced following restoration, potentially limiting ecosystem function and biodiversity in these areas.In this review, we discuss the current (limited) incorporation of invertebrates and microbes in restoration and rewilding projects. We argue that these groups should be actively rewilded during restoration to improve biodiversity, ecosystem function outcomes, and highlight how they can be used to greater effect in the future. For example, invertebrates and microbes are easily manipulated, meaning whole communities can potentially be rewilded through habitat transplants in a practice that we refer to as "whole-of-community" rewilding.We provide a framework for whole-of-community rewilding and describe empirical case studies as practical applications of this under-researched restoration tool that land managers can use to improve restoration outcomes.We hope this new perspective on whole-of-community restoration will promote applied research into restoration that incorporates all biota, irrespective of size, while also enabling a better understanding of fundamental ecological theory, such as colonization and competition trade-offs. This may be a necessary consideration as invertebrates that are important in providing ecosystem services are declining globally; targeting invertebrate communities during restoration may be crucial in stemming this decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.