Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188758›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Salivary characteristics may be associated with burning mouth syndrome?

Juan Aitken-Saavedra, Sandra-Beatriz-Chaves Tarquinio, Wellington-Luiz-De Oliveira da Rosa, Ana-Paula-Neutzling Gomes, Adriana-Fernandes da Silva, Matheus-Dos Santos Fernandez, Andressa-Goicochea Moreira, Andrea Maturana-Ramirez, Ana-Carolina-Uchoa Vasconcellos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Aitken-SaavedraDepartment of Oral Pathology and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile. Santiago, Chile.
Sandra-Beatriz-Chaves TarquinioGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Wellington-Luiz-De Oliveira da RosaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Ana-Paula-Neutzling GomesDiagnostic Center for Oral Diseases, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Adriana-Fernandes da SilvaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Matheus-Dos Santos FernandezSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Andressa-Goicochea MoreiraGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Andrea Maturana-RamirezDepartment of Oral Pathology and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile. Santiago, Chile.
Ana-Carolina-Uchoa VasconcellosGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas. Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurning mouth syndrome (BMS) it is characterized by burning and uncomfortable sensations with no clinical alterations or laboratory findings. The evaluation of the salivary characteristics of people with BMS can help the understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. This case-control study aimed to trace the salivary profile of women with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). MATERIAL AND

methods40 women with BMS and 40 control women were recruited. Unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR), pH, salivary cortisol levels, salivary viscosity, and oral health impact profile (OHIP-14 questioner) were determined.

resultsFor uSFR, mean values obtained for BMS and for control group respectively were 0.35 and 0.61 mL/min; for pH, 7.23 and 7.34; for cortisol levels, 0.36 and 0.15 μg/dL; for viscosity values, 31.1 and 45.01 mPas and for OHIP-14 scores, 21.7 and 5.7. To uSFR, cortisol levels, viscosity values and OHIP-14 scores, differences were statistically significant. Salivary cortisol levels and OHIP-14 scores were correlated positively (rho = 0.624;

conclusionsBMS women have lower uSFR and salivary viscosity and higher salivary cortisol levels that were associated with worse quality of life, compared with the control group.

Identifiers

PMID34188758
PMCPMC8223150
OpenAlexW3165121302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.