Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188690›Full record

ReviewComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Seven Mathematical Models of Hemorrhagic Shock.

Luciano Curcio, Laura D'Orsi, Andrea De Gaetano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luciano CurcioNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4571-1757
Laura D'OrsiNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "A. Ruberti, " BioMatLab (Biomathematics Laboratory), UCSC Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-9573
Andrea De GaetanoNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7712-056X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although mathematical modelling of pressure-flow dynamics in the cardiocirculatory system has a lengthy history, readily finding the appropriate model for the experimental situation at hand is often a challenge in and of itself. An ideal model would be relatively easy to use and reliable, besides being ethically acceptable. Furthermore, it would address the pathogenic features of the cardiovascular disease that one seeks to investigate. No universally valid model has been identified, even though a host of models have been developed. The object of this review is to describe several of the most relevant mathematical models of the cardiovascular system: the physiological features of circulatory dynamics are explained, and their mathematical formulations are compared. The focus is on the whole-body scale mathematical models that portray the subject's responses to hypovolemic shock. The models contained in this review differ from one another, both in the mathematical methodology adopted and in the physiological or pathological aspects described. Each model, in fact, mimics different aspects of cardiocirculatory physiology and pathophysiology to varying degrees: some of these models are geared to better understand the mechanisms of vascular hemodynamics, whereas others focus more on disease states so as to develop therapeutic standards of care or to test novel approaches. We will elucidate key issues involved in the modeling of cardiovascular system and its control by reviewing seven of these models developed to address these specific purposes.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood PressureCardiovascular SystemComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHemodynamicsHumansMathematical ConceptsRespiratory SystemShock, HemorrhagicSystems Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34188690
PMCPMC8195646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.