ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2021
Segmentation and quantification of COVID-19 infections in CT using pulmonary vessels extraction and deep learning.
Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Method for 3D Lung Tumor Reconstruction Using Generative Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimal feature selection for COVID-19 detection with CT images enabled by metaheuristic optimization and artificial intelligence.Multimedia tools and applications · 2023Article
- A deep learning-based application for COVID-19 diagnosis on CT: The Imaging COVID-19 AI initiative.PloS one · 2023Article
- A Light Deep Learning Algorithm for CT Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Integrating Domain Knowledge Into Deep Networks for Lung Ultrasound With Applications to COVID-19.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Deep Learning-Enabled Technologies for Bioimage Analysis.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Enhanced lung image segmentation using deep learning.Neural computing & applications · 2022Article
- Automatic segmentation of COVID-19 from computed tomography images using modified U-Net model-based majority voting approach.Neural computing & applications · 2022Article
- Automated System for Identifying COVID-19 Infections in Computed Tomography Images Using Deep Learning Models.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the end of 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported pneumonia that started in Wuhan, China, as a global emergency problem. Researchers quickly advanced in research to try to understand this COVID-19 and sough solutions for the front-line professionals fighting this fatal disease. One of the tools to aid in the detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this disease is computed tomography (CT). CT images provide valuable information on how this new disease affects the lungs of patients. However, the analysis of these images is not trivial, especially when researchers are searching for quick solutions. Detecting and evaluating this disease can be tiring, time-consuming, and susceptible to errors. Thus, in this study, we aim to automatically segment infections caused by COVID19 and provide quantitative measures of these infections to specialists, thus serving as a support tool. We use a database of real clinical cases from Pedro Ernesto University Hospital of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The method involves five steps: lung segmentation, segmentation and extraction of pulmonary vessels, infection segmentation, infection classification, and infection quantification. For the lung segmentation and infection segmentation tasks, we propose modifications to the traditional U-Net, including batch normalization, leaky ReLU, dropout, and residual block techniques, and name it as Residual U-Net. The proposed method yields an average Dice value of 77.1% and an average specificity of 99.76%. For quantification of infectious findings, the proposed method achieves results like that of specialists, and no measure presented a value of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.