Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188605›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2021

Segmentation and quantification of COVID-19 infections in CT using pulmonary vessels extraction and deep learning.

João O B Diniz, Darlan B P Quintanilha, Antonino C Santos Neto, Giovanni L F da Silva, Jonnison L Ferreira, Stelmo M B Netto, José D L Araújo, Luana B Da Cruz, Thamila F B Silva, Caio M da S Martins and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enhanced lung image segmentation using deep learning.Neural computing & applications · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

João O B DinizFederal Institute of Maranhão, BR-226, SN, Campus Grajaú, Vila Nova, Grajaú, MA 65940-00 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3303-3346
Darlan B P QuintanilhaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Antonino C Santos NetoFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Giovanni L F da SilvaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Jonnison L FerreiraFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Stelmo M B NettoFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
José D L AraújoFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Luana B Da CruzFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Thamila F B SilvaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Caio M da S MartinsFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Marcos M FerreiraFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Venicius G RegoFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
José M C BoaroFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Carolina L S CiprianoFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Aristófanes C SilvaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Anselmo C de PaivaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Geraldo Braz JuniorFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
João D S de AlmeidaFederal University of Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses, SN, Campus do Bacanga, Bacanga, São Luís, MA 65085-580 Brazil.
Rodolfo A NunesRio de Janeiro State University, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20551-030 Brazil.
Roberto MogamiRio de Janeiro State University, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20551-030 Brazil.
M GattassPontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, R. São Vicente, 225, Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22453-900 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the end of 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported pneumonia that started in Wuhan, China, as a global emergency problem. Researchers quickly advanced in research to try to understand this COVID-19 and sough solutions for the front-line professionals fighting this fatal disease. One of the tools to aid in the detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this disease is computed tomography (CT). CT images provide valuable information on how this new disease affects the lungs of patients. However, the analysis of these images is not trivial, especially when researchers are searching for quick solutions. Detecting and evaluating this disease can be tiring, time-consuming, and susceptible to errors. Thus, in this study, we aim to automatically segment infections caused by COVID19 and provide quantitative measures of these infections to specialists, thus serving as a support tool. We use a database of real clinical cases from Pedro Ernesto University Hospital of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The method involves five steps: lung segmentation, segmentation and extraction of pulmonary vessels, infection segmentation, infection classification, and infection quantification. For the lung segmentation and infection segmentation tasks, we propose modifications to the traditional U-Net, including batch normalization, leaky ReLU, dropout, and residual block techniques, and name it as Residual U-Net. The proposed method yields an average Dice value of 77.1% and an average specificity of 99.76%. For quantification of infectious findings, the proposed method achieves results like that of specialists, and no measure presented a value of

Indexed as

COVID-19CT findingsInfection quantificationInfection segmentationLung segmentationMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID34188605
PMCPMC8224997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.