ReviewNoro psikiyatri arsivi2021
History of Myasthenia Gravis Revisited.
Review in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of rituximab in anti-MuSK myasthenia Gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Is Isolated Inferior Rectus Weakness a Strong Indicator for Myasthenia Gravis?The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod for patients with thymoma associated generalized myasthenia gravis during the perioperative period: a four-case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Milestones in the history of neurocritical care.Neurological research and practice · 2023Review
- [Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: impact and approach].Revista de neurologia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first description of myasthenia gravis (MG) was given by Thomas Willis in 1672. MG was the focus of attention after mid-nineteenth century and a great amount of information has been accumulated in a span of 150 years. The aim of this review is to convey this information according to a particular systematic and to briefly relate the experience of Istanbul University. MG history was examined in four periods: 1868-1930, 1930-1960, 1960-1990, and 1990-2020. In
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.