Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188534›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2021

A Systematic Review of the Prospective Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Pain.

Teresa J Marin, Jill A Hayden, Rebecca Lewinson, Quenby Mahood, Debra Pepler, Joel Katz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Provider Implicit Racial Bias in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa J MarinDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6522-4601
Jill A HaydenDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7026-144X
Rebecca LewinsonDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7157-2784
Quenby MahoodSickKids Hospital, Hospital Library, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-2039
Debra PeplerDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2505-289X
Joel KatzDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-447X
York University · CADalhousie University · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review synthesized evidence about the relationship between childhood bullying victimization and chronic pain, with a focus on the temporal nature of the relationship and moderating factors, such as the type and intensity of victimization.

methodWe included prospective cohort studies that examined the relationship between childhood bullying victimization and pain measured at least three months later. We conducted electronic searches of Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL up to June 30, 2019. Standard methodological procedures consistent with Cochrane reviews of prognosis studies were used (PROSPERO record ID 133146).

resultsWe included four longitudinal studies (6275 participants) in this review. The mean age of participants at baseline ranged from 10 to 14 years and the follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 12 years. Two of the four studies were judged as having high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of results from four studies revealed increased risk of pain among victimized compared to non-victimized youth (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.06-1.97], but the effect size was small and not clinically important. Only one study examined the inverse association (ie, from pain to victimization), and there was not enough evidence to conduct a meaningful analysis of the proposed moderators.

conclusionsStudy findings were limited by few prospective studies. Meta-analytic findings suggested that victimization may incur some risk for later pain, although the evidence was judged to be very low quality. High-quality studies that measure and report the nuances of bullying victimization are needed to test the proposed moderator models.

Indexed as

bullyingchronic painmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34188534
PMCPMC8236267
OpenAlexW3174569335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.