ReviewIndian journal of palliative care2021
Withdrawal from Dialysis: Why and When?
Review in Indian journal of palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Kidney Supportive Care in End-Stage Kidney Disease.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Cardiorenal Syndrome in the Elderly: Challenges and Considerations.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A qualitative exploration of cAregiver experienCes Of conseRvatively maNaged kidney failure: the ACORN study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Ethical principles across countries: does 'ethical' mean the same everywhere?Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Dialysis Discontinuation, Prognosis, and Shared Decision-Making.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Unravelling complex choices: multi-stakeholder perceptions on dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care in kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Urgency for Kidney Palliative Care in Chinese Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Kannada Translation and Validation of the ESAS-r Renal for Symptom Burden Survey in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Death with Dignity in End-of-Life Nursing Care: Concept Analysis by Rodgers' Evolutionary Method.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney diseases may request for withdrawal of dialyses for many reasons. Healthcare practitioners frequently puzzled by ethical dilemma of respecting patient's wishes and beneficence of continuing dialysis. Shared decision-making and negotiating goal of care help in decision-making in patients' interests. Proactive identification guidelines that may be used for screening help in weighing options of dialysis and conservative care during progressive decline of clinical condition. Proactive identification guidelines may be used for screening. It helps in weighing options of dialysis versus conservative care during progressive decline of clinical condition. An individualized, patientcentred discussion, rather than disease-oriented, approach may be adapted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.