Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188360›Full record

ArticleSensors and actuators. B, Chemical2021

Nanoparticle transfer biosensors for the non-invasive detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens trapped in surgical face masks.

Andreu Vaquer, Alejandra Alba-Patiño, Cristina Adrover-Jaume, Steven M Russell, María Aranda, Marcio Borges, Joana Mena, Alberto Del Castillo, Antonia Socias, Luisa Martín and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Andreu VaquerMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Alejandra Alba-PatiñoMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Cristina Adrover-JaumeMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Steven M RussellMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
María ArandaMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Marcio BorgesMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Joana MenaMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Alberto Del CastilloMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Antonia SociasMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Luisa MartínMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
María Magdalena ArellanoMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Miguel AgudoMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Marta Gonzalez-FreireTranslational Research In Aging and Longevity (TRIAL) Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Manuela BesalduchServicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Servei de Salut Illes Balears, Spain.
Antonio ClementeMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Enrique BarónMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.
Roberto de la RicaMultidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigens in respiratory tract samples has become a widespread method for screening new SARS-CoV-2 infections. This requires a nasopharyngeal swab performed by a trained healthcare worker, which puts strain on saturated healthcare services. In this manuscript we describe a new approach for non-invasive COVID-19 diagnosis. It consists of using mobile biosensors for detecting viral antigens trapped in surgical face masks worn by patients. The biosensors are made of filter paper containing a nanoparticle reservoir. The nanoparticles transfer from the biosensor to the mask on contact, where they generate colorimetric signals that are quantified with a smartphone app. Sample collection requires wearing a surgical mask for 30 min, and the total assay time is shorter than 10 min. When tested in a cohort of 27 patients with mild or no symptoms, an area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC) of 0.99 was obtained (96.2 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity). Serial measurements revealed a high sensitivity and specificity when masks were worn up to 6 days after diagnosis. Surgical face masks are inexpensive and widely available, which makes this approach easy to implement anywhere. The excellent sensitivity, even when tested with asymptomatic patient samples, along with the mobile detection scheme and non-invasive sampling procedure, makes this biosensor design ideal for mass screening.

Indexed as

AUC-ROC, area under the ROC curve, where ROC is the receiver operating characteristic curveBiosensorCOPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOVID-19IgG, immunoglobulin GPP, polypropyleneRapid diagnostic testRT-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2SmartphoneWearable

Identifiers

PMID34188360
PMCPMC8225299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.