Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188332›Full record

ArticleScientometrics2021

COVID-19 in the Twitterverse, from epidemic to pandemic: information-sharing behavior and Twitter as an information carrier.

Miyoung Chong, Han Woo Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Delving into Data Science Methods in Response to the COVID-19 Infodemic.Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miyoung ChongDeliberative Media Lab, University of Virginia, 1605 Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-6678
Han Woo ParkDepartment of Media & Communication, Interdisciplinary Graduate Programs of Digital Convergence Business and East Asian Cultural Studies, Founder of the Cyber Emotions Research Institute, YeungNam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsangbuk-do Gyeongsan-si, 38541 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1378-2473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we defined a Twitter network as an information channel that includes information sources containing embedded messages. We conducted stage-based comparative analyses of Twitter networks during three periods: the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, the period when the epidemic was becoming a global phenomenon, and the beginning of the pandemic. We also analyzed the characteristics of scientific information sources and content on Twitter during the sample period. At the beginning of the epidemic, Twitter users largely shared trustworthy news information sources about the novel coronavirus. Widely shared scientific information focused on clinical investigations and case studies of the new coronavirus as the disease became a pandemic while non-scientific information sources and messages illustrated the social and political aspects of the global outbreak, often including emotional elements. Multiple suspicious, bot-like Twitter accounts were identified as a great connector of the COVID-19 Twitterverse, particularly in the beginning of the global crisis. Our findings suggest that the information carriers, which are information channels, sources, and messages were coherently interlocked, forming an information organism. The study results can help public health organizations design communication strategies, which often require prompt decision-making to manage urgent needs under the circumstances of an epidemic.

Indexed as

AltmetricsCOVID-19InfodemicInformation sharingPandemicPublic health surveillanceTwitter

Identifiers

PMID34188332
PMCPMC8221743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.