ArticleIndian journal of dermatology
Real-Life Experience of Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Refractory Cases of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and its Effect on the Quality of Life of Patients.
Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of combining histaglobulin with antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in a tertiary care hospital setting- a randomized trial.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of switching to bilastine, an H1-antihistamine, in patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (H1-SWITCH): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group comparative study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Bilastine Up-Dosing in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Uncontrolled with Licensed Doses of Other Second-Generation Antihistamines-An Institution-Based, Open-Label, Single-Group Longitudinal Trial.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Bilastine's Efficacy and Safety in Treating Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria in Iraqi Patients.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- A Prospective Randomized Non-Blinded Study of Safety and Efficacy of Bilastine Up-Dosing (40 mg) Versus Combination of Bilastine 20 mg With Levocetirizine 5 mg in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
- Real-World Indian Experience of Switchover to Bilastine 40 mg/day in CSU Patient Refractory to Other Antihistamines at Double Dose.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
- Bilastine in Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Disease Control and Cytokine Modulation in an Open-label Prospective Study.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
- Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria in Indian Settings: Skin Allergy Research Society's Guideline-2022.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSecond-generation H1-antihistamines (SGAHs) are the mainstay of treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Bilastine, newer non-sedating SGAHs, was recently introduced in India after the approval of the Drugs Controller General of India. There is a paucity of evidence about the long-term efficacy and safety of Bilastine in Indian patients. We undertook this study to find the long-term efficacy and tolerability of Bilastine in patients with CSU in India. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective chart analysis was conducted by analyzing electronic medical records from May 1, 2019, to March 20, 2020, to identify patients of CSU who were prescribed Bilastine. Adult patients, with CSU >6 months were included, who had an unsatisfactory response as per Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) to previous antihistamine therapies, and who continued treatment for at least 6 months were included. Treatment effectiveness was determined by retrospectively reviewing their UAS7 scores from their medical records and evaluating their scores at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Also, DLQI was assessed and compared at baseline and week 24.
resultForty-nine patients were found to fulfill the criteria and included in the study. At the end of 24 weeks, 51% of patients (
conclusionThe study showed that in patients who had an inadequate response with commonly used antihistamines at a double dose or combined use, switching over to Bilastine resulted not only in relieving the symptoms of CSU but also improved the quality of life of the patients with CSU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.