Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188198›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance.

Jessica K Hlay, Graham Albert, Carlota Batres, George Richardson, Caitlyn Placek, Steven Arnocky, Debra Lieberman, Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 and Memory: A Novel Contamination Effect in Memory.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica K HlayDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd. #105, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Graham AlbertDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd. #105, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Carlota BatresDepartment of Psychology, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, USA.
George RichardsonSchool of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Caitlyn PlacekDepartment of Anthropology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Steven ArnockyDepartment of Psychology, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.
Debra LiebermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Carolyn R Hodges-SimeonDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd. #105, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. crhodges@bu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavioral immune system posits that disgust functions to protect animals from pathogen exposure. Therefore, cues of pathogen risk should be a primary driver influencing variation in disgust. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the relationship between current pathogen risk and disgust, nor the correlation between objective and perceived pathogen risk have been addressed using ecologically valid measures in a global sample. The current article reports two studies addressing these gaps. In Study 1, we include a global sample (n = 361) and tested the influence of both perceived pathogen exposure and an objective measure of pathogen risk-local communicable infectious disease mortality rates-on individual differences in pathogen and sexual disgust sensitivities. In Study 2, we first replicate Study 1's analyses in another large sample (n = 821), targeting four countries (US, Italy, Brazil, and India); we then replaced objective and perceived pathogen risk with variables specific to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In Study 1, both local infection mortality rates and perceived infection exposure predicted unique variance in pathogen and sexual disgust. In Study 2, we found that perceived infection exposure positively predicted sexual disgust, as predicted. When substituting perceived and objective SARS-CoV-2 risk in our models, perceived risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 positively predicted pathogen and sexual disgust, and state case rates negatively predicted pathogen disgust. Further, in both studies, objective measures of risk (i.e., local infection mortality and SARS-CoV-2 rates) positively correlated with subjective measures of risk (i.e., perceived infection exposure and perceived SARS-CoV-2 risk). Ultimately, these results provide two pieces of foundational evidence for the behavioral immune system: 1) perceptions of pathogen risk accurately assay local, objective mortality risk across countries, and 2) both perceived and objective pathogen risk explain variance in disgust levels.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningDisgustHealth BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilCOVID-19FemaleHumansIndiaItalyLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk

Identifiers

PMID34188198
PMCPMC8241835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.