Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188193›Full record

ArticleHeredity2021

Divergence and introgression in small apes, the genus Hylobates, revealed by reduced representation sequencing.

Kazunari Matsudaira, Takafumi Ishida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kazunari MatsudairaDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. kaz.matsudaira@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-9928
Takafumi IshidaDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gibbons of the genus Hylobates, which inhabit Southeast Asia, show great diversity and comprise seven to nine species. Natural hybridisation has been observed in several species contact zones, but the history and extent of hybridisation and introgression in possibly historical and the current contact zones remain unclear. To uncover Hylobates species phylogeny and the extent of introgression in their evolution, genotyping by random amplicon sequencing-direct (GRAS-Di) was applied to 47 gibbons, representing seven Hylobates species/subspecies and two outgroup gibbon species. Over 200,000 autosomal single-nucleotide variant sites were identified. The autosomal phylogeny supported that divergence from the mainland species began ~3.5 million years ago, and subsequently occurred among the Sundaic island species. Significant introgression signals were detected between H. lar and H. pileatus, H. lar and H. agilis and H. albibarbis and H. muelleri, which all are parapatric and form ongoing hybrid zones. Furthermore, the introgression signals were detected in every analysed individual of these species, indicating a relatively long history of hybridisation, which might have affected the entire gene pool. By contrast, signals of introgression were either not detected or doubtful in other species pairs living on different islands, indicating the rarity of hybridisation and introgression, even though the Sundaic islands were connected during the Pliocene and Pleistocene glacial events.

Indexed as

HominidaeHylobatesAnimalsHybridization, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34188193
PMCPMC8405704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.