Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The maintenance of microbial community in human fecal samples by a cost effective preservation buffer.

Chongming Wu, Tianda Chen, Wenyi Xu, Tingting Zhang, Yuwei Pei, Yanan Yang, Fang Zhang, Hao Guo, Qingshi Wang, Li Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chongming Wu *Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Center, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China. cmwu@implad.ac.cn.
Tianda Chen *Beijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Wenyi Xu *Beijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Tingting ZhangBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Yuwei PeiBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Yanan YangPharmacology and Toxicology Research Center, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Fang ZhangPharmacology and Toxicology Research Center, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hao GuoBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Qingshi WangBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Li WangBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China.
Bowen ZhaoBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100070, China. zhaobowen@quantibio.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the burgeoning microbiome field, powerful sequencing approaches and accompanied bioanalytical methods have made tremendous contributions to the discoveries of breakthroughs, which favor to unravel the intimate interplay between gut microbiota and human health. The proper preservation of samples before being processed is essential to guarantee the authenticity and reliability of microbiome studies. Hence, the development of preservation methods is extremely important to hold samples eligible for the consequent analysis, especially population cohort-based investigations or those spanning species or geography, which frequently facing difficulties in suppling freezing conditions. Although there are several commercial products available, the exploration of cost-efficient and ready-to-use preservation methods are still in a large demand. Here, we performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing and demonstrated that microbial consortia in human fecal samples were substantially preserved within a temporary storage of 4 h, independent of the storage temperature. We also verified a previous reported self-made preservation buffer (PB buffer) could not only preserve fecal microbiota at room temperature up to 4 weeks but also enable samples to endure a high temperature condition which mimics temperature variations in summer logistics. Moreover, PB buffer exhibited suitability for human saliva as well. Collectively, PB buffer may be a valuable choice to stabilize samples if neither freezing facilities nor liquid nitrogen is available.

Indexed as

CryopreservationMetagenomeSpecimen HandlingFecesHumansMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID34188136
PMCPMC8242035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.