Trial reportScientific reports2021
Use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of subsequent bone loss in a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Psychotropic medication use and bone loss in men: longitudinal study.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- The Effect of Duloxetine on Fusion in Rats Undergoing Posterolateral Spinal Fusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Paroxetine as a Therapeutic Agent in Inflammatory Osteolysis: Mechanistic Insights and Efficacy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram oxalate negatively impacts the fracture healing in healthy adults and in osteoporotic rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rates of fractures by medication type in patients with bipolar disorder: A retrospective cohort analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The Lignan-Rich Fraction fromNutrients · 2022Article
- Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined whether the use of SRIs is associated with an increased risk of bone loss using a nested case-control design with a nationwide population-based cohort in Korea. Using the Korean National Health Screening Cohort, subjects newly diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia (n = 55,799) were matched with controls (n = 278,995) at a ratio of 1:5. We stratified the participants by their time-dependent use of SRIs and sex and controlled for various confounders, including lifestyle habits, laboratory data, and comorbidities. Conditional logistic regression showed that both recent and former users of SRIs had an increased risk of subsequent bone loss compared with non-users: men [recent users: odds ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% confidential interval (CI) 1.20, 1.53; former-users: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01, 1.20]; women (recent users: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48; former-users: OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.21). The use of SRIs was associated with an increased risk of bone loss in both men and women. In particular, the association was stronger in recent users. These findings provide population-level evidence for the risk of bone loss associated with SRI exposure and highlight the importance of monitoring the bone health of SRI users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.