Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34188080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Investigating the utility of VR for spatial understanding in surgical planning: evaluation of head-mounted to desktop display.

Georges Hattab, Adamantini Hatzipanayioti, Anna Klimova, Micha Pfeiffer, Peter Klausing, Michael Breucha, Felix von Bechtolsheim, Jens R Helmert, Jürgen Weitz, Sebastian Pannasch and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Benefit of virtual reality during visceral artery aneurysms open and endovascular surgery planning.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metaverse Wearables for Immersive Digital Healthcare: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Georges Hattab *Division of Translational Surgical Oncology (TSO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Adamantini Hatzipanayioti *Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Anna KlimovaInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry (IMB), Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Micha PfeifferDivision of Translational Surgical Oncology (TSO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Peter KlausingDivision of Translational Surgical Oncology (TSO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Michael BreuchaDivision of Translational Surgical Oncology (TSO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Felix von BechtolsheimCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Jens R HelmertCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian PannaschCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Stefanie SpeidelDivision of Translational Surgical Oncology (TSO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany. stefanie.speidel@nct-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances have made Virtual Reality (VR) attractive in both research and real world applications such as training, rehabilitation, and gaming. Although these other fields benefited from VR technology, it remains unclear whether VR contributes to better spatial understanding and training in the context of surgical planning. In this study, we evaluated the use of VR by comparing the recall of spatial information in two learning conditions: a head-mounted display (HMD) and a desktop screen (DT). Specifically, we explored (a) a scene understanding and then (b) a direction estimation task using two 3D models (i.e., a liver and a pyramid). In the scene understanding task, participants had to navigate the rendered the 3D models by means of rotation, zoom and transparency in order to substantially identify the spatial relationships among its internal objects. In the subsequent direction estimation task, participants had to point at a previously identified target object, i.e., internal sphere, on a materialized 3D-printed version of the model using a tracked pointing tool. Results showed that the learning condition (HMD or DT) did not influence participants' memory and confidence ratings of the models. In contrast, the model type, that is, whether the model to be recalled was a liver or a pyramid significantly affected participants' memory about the internal structure of the model. Furthermore, localizing the internal position of the target sphere was also unaffected by participants' previous experience of the model via HMD or DT. Overall, results provide novel insights on the use of VR in a surgical planning scenario and have paramount implications in medical learning by shedding light on the mental model we make to recall spatial structures.

Identifiers

PMID34188080
PMCPMC8241863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.