ArticleScientific reports2021
Investigating the utility of VR for spatial understanding in surgical planning: evaluation of head-mounted to desktop display.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of virtual reality on spatial-anatomical understanding in preoperative liver surgery: a randomized crossover study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Benefit of virtual reality during visceral artery aneurysms open and endovascular surgery planning.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Virtual reality-augmented differentiable simulations for digital twin applications in surgical planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bridging between hype and implementation in medical extended reality.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Metaverse Wearables for Immersive Digital Healthcare: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Technological advancements in surgical laparoscopy considering artificial intelligence: a survey among surgeons in Germany.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Virtual reality a technological miracle transforming physical rehabilitation: A scoping review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Determinants of Learning Anatomy in an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment - A Scoping Review.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Advantages of a Training Course for Surgical Planning in Virtual Reality for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Crossover Study.JMIR serious games · 2023Article
- Real-time mixed reality display of dual particle radiation detector data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional virtual reality in surgical planning for breast cancer with reconstruction.SAGE open medical case reports · 2023Article
- Mixed-Reality-Assisted Puncture of the Common Femoral Artery in a Phantom Model.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- The use and future perspective of Artificial Intelligence-A survey among German surgeons.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- New Approach to Accelerated Image Annotation by Leveraging Virtual Reality and Cloud Computing.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent technological advances have made Virtual Reality (VR) attractive in both research and real world applications such as training, rehabilitation, and gaming. Although these other fields benefited from VR technology, it remains unclear whether VR contributes to better spatial understanding and training in the context of surgical planning. In this study, we evaluated the use of VR by comparing the recall of spatial information in two learning conditions: a head-mounted display (HMD) and a desktop screen (DT). Specifically, we explored (a) a scene understanding and then (b) a direction estimation task using two 3D models (i.e., a liver and a pyramid). In the scene understanding task, participants had to navigate the rendered the 3D models by means of rotation, zoom and transparency in order to substantially identify the spatial relationships among its internal objects. In the subsequent direction estimation task, participants had to point at a previously identified target object, i.e., internal sphere, on a materialized 3D-printed version of the model using a tracked pointing tool. Results showed that the learning condition (HMD or DT) did not influence participants' memory and confidence ratings of the models. In contrast, the model type, that is, whether the model to be recalled was a liver or a pyramid significantly affected participants' memory about the internal structure of the model. Furthermore, localizing the internal position of the target sphere was also unaffected by participants' previous experience of the model via HMD or DT. Overall, results provide novel insights on the use of VR in a surgical planning scenario and have paramount implications in medical learning by shedding light on the mental model we make to recall spatial structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.