Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187826›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia.

Bruno Marchal, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Lela Sulaberidze, Ivdity Chikovani, Maia Uchaneishvili, Natia Shengelia, Karin Diaconu, Anna Vassall, Akaki Zoidze, Ariadna Nebot Giralt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bruno MarchalHealth Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade AbejirindeHealth Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium i.o.abejirinde@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-0541
Lela SulaberidzeResearch Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ivdity ChikovaniResearch Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Maia UchaneishviliResearch Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Natia ShengeliaResearch Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Karin DiaconuInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-9725
Anna VassallDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Akaki ZoidzeResearch Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ariadna Nebot GiraltHealth Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Sophie WitterInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-6188

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P015018/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper presents the iterative process of participatory multistakeholder engagement that informed the development of a new national tuberculosis (TB) policy in Georgia, and the lessons learnt.

methodsGuided by realist evaluation methods, a multistakeholder dialogue was organised to elicit stakeholders' assumptions on challenges and possible solutions for better TB control. Two participatory workshops were conducted with key actors, interspersed by reflection meetings within the research team and discussions with policymakers. Using concept mapping and causal mapping techniques, and drawing causal loop diagrams, we visualised how actors understood TB service provision challenges and the potential means by which a results-based financing (RBF) policy could address these.

settingThe study was conducted in Tbilisi, Georgia.

participantsA total of 64 key actors from the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, staff of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria Georgia Project, the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health, the National TB programme, TB service providers and members of the research team were involved in the workshops.

resultsFindings showed that beyond provider incentives, additional policy components were necessary. These included broadening the incentive package to include institutional and organisational incentives, retraining service providers, clear redistribution of roles to support an integrated care model, and refinement of monitoring tools. Health system elements, such as effective referral systems and health information systems were highlighted as necessary for service improvement.

conclusionsDeveloping policies that address complex issues requires methods that facilitate linkages between multiple stakeholders and between theory and practice. Such participatory approaches can be informed by realist evaluation principles and visually facilitated by causal loop diagrams. This approach allowed us leverage stakeholders' knowledge and expertise on TB service delivery and RBF to codesign a new policy.

Indexed as

TuberculosisGeorgiaGeorgia (Republic)Government ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansPolicyhealth policyqualitative researchtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34187826
PMCPMC8245474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.