Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187825›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) score in older adults undergoing curative intent chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.

Vikas Ostwal, Anant Ramaswamy, Prabhat Bhargava, Tejaswee Hatkhambkar, Rohit Swami, Sameer Rastogi, Sarika Mandavkar, Jaya Ghosh, Jyoti Bajpai, Seema Gulia and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07163169 (Correlation and Comparison Analyses of CARG, G8, and Frailty Tests in Predicting Chemotherapy-Associated Toxicity), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07163169 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Correlation and Comparison Analyses of CARG, G8, and Frailty Tests in Predicting Chemotherapy-Associated Toxicity: A Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsOncology, Geriatric Oncology, Physiology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive value of the Cancer and Aging Research Group Score for chemotherapy toxicities in older adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vikas OstwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0067-4748
Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India anantr13@gmail.com.
Prabhat BhargavaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tejaswee HatkhambkarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rohit SwamiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sameer RastogiDepartment of Medical Oncology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Sarika MandavkarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jaya GhoshDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jyoti BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Seema GuliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sujay SrinivasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sushmita RathDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sudeep GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-6378
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) toxicity score is used to assess toxicity risk in geriatric patients receiving chemotherapy.

objectiveThe primary aim was to validate the CARG score in geriatric patients treated with curative intent chemotherapy in predicting grade 3-5 toxicities.

designThis was a longitudinal prospective observational study.

settingTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, a tertiary cancer care referral centre.

participantsPatients, aged ≥65 years, with gastrointestinal, breast or gynaecological stage I-III cancers being planned for curative intent chemotherapy. A total of 270 patients were required for accrual in the study. EXPOSURES: Total risk score ranged from 0 (lowest toxicity risk) to 19 (highest toxicity risk). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate whether the CARG risk score predicted for grade 3-5 toxicities.

resultsThe study cohort of 270 patients had a mean age of 69 (65-83) years, with the most common cancers being gastrointestinal (79%). Fifty-two per cent of patients had atleast one grade 3-5 toxicity. The risk of toxicity was increased with an increasing risk score (42% low risk, 51% medium risk and 79% high risk; p<0.001). There was no association between either Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p=0.69) or age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.79) risk categories and grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study validates the CARG risk score in predicting for grade 3-5 toxicities in geriatric oncology patients receiving curative intent chemotherapy and can be considered as the standard of care before planning chemotherapy in every elderly patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2016/10/007357; Results.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIndiaProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntineoplastic Agentsadult oncologyadverse eventsbreast tumourschemotherapygastrointestinal tumoursgynaecological oncology

Identifiers

PMID34187825
PMCPMC8245449
OpenAlexW3177478067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.