Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187594›Full record

SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2021

Pooled estimate of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Angeline Jeyakumar, Vidhya Shinde, Reshma Ravindran

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical characteristics of pregnancy and lactation associated osteoporosis: An online survey study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angeline JeyakumarInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Maharashtra, India. angelinejaykumar@gmail.com.
Vidhya ShindeInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Maharashtra, India.
Reshma RavindranInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency among pregnant women is a public health concern globally. In India, individual studies report high prevalence. However, lack of national data masks the true burden. This work determined the pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

methodsThree different search engines yielded 15 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed by 10 different criteria and summary of study quality was categorized as per Cochrane standards. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy pregnant women and heterogeneity among selected studies. A sample of n = 4088 was used to study the pooled prevalence among pregnant women.

resultsThe random effects combined estimate was 32.35% (95% CI, (12.58-117.48). High heterogeneity (tau

conclusionPooled estimate > 30% emphasizes the need for screening through antenatal care services and initiate preventive measures to address the deficiency.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleVitamin D DeficiencyFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceVitamin DVitamin DMeta-analysisPregnant womenSystematic reviewVitamin D deficiency

Identifiers

PMID34187594
PMCPMC8243731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.