Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187586›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2021

In-vivo application of low frequency alternating currents on porcine cervical vagus nerve evokes reversible nerve conduction block.

Maria Ivette Muzquiz, Lindsay Richardson, Christian Vetter, Macallister Smolik, Awadh Alhawwash, Adam Goodwill, Rizwan Bashirullah, Michael Carr, Ken Yoshida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Ivette MuzquizDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA. mimuzqui@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8657-6101
Lindsay RichardsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Christian VetterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Macallister SmolikDepartment of Biology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Awadh AlhawwashWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Adam GoodwillDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Rizwan BashirullahGalvani Bioelectronics, Glaxo Smith Kline, GSK, King of Prussia, USA.
Michael CarrGalvani Bioelectronics, Glaxo Smith Kline, GSK, King of Prussia, USA.
Ken YoshidaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
University of Indianapolis · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USIndiana University School of MedicinePurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Reversible block of nerve conduction using low frequency alternating currentsR21EB028469 · NIBIB · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI YOSHIDA, KEN · 2019 to 2021
$630k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB028469NIH HHS R21EB028469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper describes a method to reversibly block nerve conduction through direct application of a 1 Hz sinusoidal current waveform delivered through a bipolar nerve cuff electrode. This low frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was previously shown to reversibly block the effects of vagal pulse stimulation evoked bradycardia in-vivo in the anaesthetised rat model (Mintch et al. 2019). The present work measured the effectiveness of LFAC block on larger caliber myelinated vagal afferent fibers in human sized nerve bundles projecting to changes in breathing rate mediated by the Hering-Breuer (HB) reflex in anaesthetized domestic swine (n=5).

methodsTwo bipolar cuff electrodes were implanted unilaterally to the left cervical vagus nerve, which was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. A tripolar recording cuff electrode was placed rostral to the bipolar stimulating electrodes on the same nerve to measure changes in the compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) elicited by the vagal pulse stimulation and conditioned by the LFAC waveform. Standard pulse stimulation was applied at a sufficient level to induce a reduction in breathing rate through the HB reflex. If unblocked, the HB reflex would cause breathing to slow down and potentially halt completely. Block was quantified by the ability of LFAC to reduce the effect of the HB reflex by monitoring the respiration rate during LFAC alone, LFAC and vagal stimulation, and vagal stimulation alone.

resultsLFAC achieved 87.2 ±8.8% block (n=5) at current levels of 1.1 ±0.3 mA

conclusionThese novel findings suggest that LFAC is a potential alternative or complementary method to other electrical blocking techniques in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Conduction blockLow frequency alternating current blockNerve blockNeuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID34187586
PMCPMC8243469
OpenAlexW3174262455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.