Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187554›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

The role of routine FIBERoptic bronchoscopy monitoring during percutaneous dilatational TRACHeostomy (FIBERTRACH): a study protocol for a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

José M Añón, María Soledad Arellano, Manuel Pérez-Márquez, Claudia Díaz-Alvariño, José A Márquez-Alonso, Jorge Rodríguez-Peláez, Kapil Nanwani-Nanwani, Ana Martín-Pellicer, Belén Civantos, Alba López-Fernández and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04265625 (The Role of Routine Fiberoptic Bronchoscopic Guidance During Percutaneous Tracheostomy. A Prospective Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04265625 nacompletednot on this map

The Role of Routine Fiberoptic Bronchoscopic Guidance During Percutaneous Tracheostomy. A Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La PazRan2019 to 2024Enrolled442ConditionsComplicationsArmsendoscopic guidance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

José M AñónIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. jmaelizalde@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2299-4849
María Soledad ArellanoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Pérez-MárquezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Claudia Díaz-AlvariñoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
José A Márquez-AlonsoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Rodríguez-PeláezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Kapil Nanwani-NanwaniIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Martín-PellicerIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Belén CivantosIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Alba López-FernándezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Irene SeisesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge García-NerínIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Juan C FigueiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Henar CaseroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Javier VejoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Alexander AgrifoglioIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía CachafeiroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Mariana Díaz-AlmirónBiostatistics Research Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús VillarCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheostomy is one of the most frequent techniques in intensive care units (ICU). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB) is a safety measure when performing a percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT), but the controversy surrounding the routine use of FB as part of the procedure remains open. National surveys in some European countries showed that the use of FB is non-standardized. Retrospective studies have not shown a significant difference in complications between procedures performed with or without a bronchoscope. International guidelines have not been able to establish recommendations regarding the use of FB in PDT due to lack of evidence.

designThis is a multicenter (three centers at the time of  publishing this paper) randomized controlled clinical trial to examine the safety of percutaneous tracheostomy using FB. We will include all consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU in whom percutaneous tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation is indicated and with no exclusion criteria for using FB. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive blind PDT or PDT under endoscopic guidance. All procedures will be performed by experienced intensivists in PDT and FB. A Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor the trial. The primary outcome is the incidence of perioperative complications. DISCUSSION: FB is a safe technique when performing PDT although its use is not universally accepted in all ICUs as a routine practice. Should PDT be monitored routinely with endoscopic guidance? This study will assess the role of FB monitoring during PDT.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04265625. Registered on February 11, 2020.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyTracheostomyAdultDilatationEuropeHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesComplicationsEndoscopic guideFiberoptic bronchoscopyPercutaneous tracheostomyProlonged mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34187554
PMCPMC8240418
OpenAlexW3160748936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.