Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34187385›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2021

Symptomatic treatment (using NSAIDS) versus antibiotics in uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Albert Macaire C Ong Lopez, Charles Jeffrey L Tan, Antonio S Yabon, Armin N Masbang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albert Macaire C Ong LopezDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center-Quezon City, 279 E Rodriguez Sr. Ave, Quezon City, 1112, Metro Manila, Philippines. macaire014@gmail.com.
Charles Jeffrey L TanDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center-Quezon City, 279 E Rodriguez Sr. Ave, Quezon City, 1112, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Antonio S YabonDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center-Quezon City, 279 E Rodriguez Sr. Ave, Quezon City, 1112, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Armin N MasbangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Disease, St. Luke's Medical Center-Quezon City, 279 E Rodriguez Sr. Ave, Quezon City, 1112, Metro Manila, Philippines.
St. Luke's Medical Center · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend empiric antibiotics as first-line treatment for uncomplicated UTI. Despite proven benefits in treatment, antibiotic resistance rates remain on the rise. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as an effective and safe option in the treatment of uncomplicated lower UTI among non-pregnant women compared to antibiotics.

methodsA systematic literature search in PUBMED, CENTRAL, and ACP databases from inception to April 2021 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compare the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus antibiotics in non-pregnant women ≥18 years old with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection. Primary outcomes were symptom resolution of UTI by Day 3 or 4 of intervention, and upper UTI complications. Secondary outcomes include persistence of positive urine culture despite treatment and need for another rescue antibiotic. Random and fixed-effects model for dichotomous data using Mantel-Haenszel and Peto odds method were reported at 95% CI followed by sensitivity analysis for substantial heterogeneity.

resultsFour RCTs involving 1165 patients were analyzed. The probability of having a symptom resolution by Day 3 or 4 with NSAID use is only less than three-fourths of that with antibiotic treatment (RR: 0.69, 95% CIs [0.55, 0.86], p = 0.0008, I

conclusionAntibiotic treatment was more effective than use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection with an overall moderate certainty of evidence.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUrinary Tract InfectionsYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntibioticsNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsNSAIDSSymptomatic treatmentUncomplicated UTI

Identifiers

PMID34187385
PMCPMC8243445
OpenAlexW3120948188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.