ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2021
Aflibercept Treatment Results and Association with Baseline Characteristics in Cases of Newly Diagnosed Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined Therapy Versus Fortified Anti-VEGF Monotherapy in Type C Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Biomarker Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate functional and anatomical responses to intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatment in newly diagnosed and untreated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) cases and to investigate the effect of baseline lesion characteristics on anatomical responses. Materials and Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional study included a series of 139 eyes of 133 patients that were diagnosed with active nvAMD and had not been treated. All eyes were subjected to complete ophthalmological examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography, and 42 eyes also underwent indocyanine green angiography. IVA treatment was performed using a "treat and extend" regimen after 3 injections at 4-6 weeks intervals. Anatomical and functional responses at 4 weeks after the last injection were evaluated in eyes that completed 3 injections and the subgroup of eyes that completed 6 IVA injections. The effect of baseline lesion characteristics on IVA treatment results was also investigated. Results: All 139 eyes included in the study received 3 IVA injections (group 1) and 62 received 6 IVA injections. Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (p<0.001 for both). The rate of complete response was 54.6% and 58.0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1, the presence of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and serous PED were identified as negative initial factors (p=0.043, p=0.005, respectively). However, none of the baseline characteristics were significantly associated with anatomical response in group 2. Conclusion: In our study, it was determined that successful anatomical and functional results were achieved with 3 and 6 doses of IVA in eyes with newly-diagnosed and untreated nvAMD. Among baseline characteristics, the presence of PED and serous PED in particular were found to be factors affecting treatment response negatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.